Ies [FIGS]; Maxwell, 1992). Testing Session Procedures Prior to testing, participants abstained for >3 hr

Ies [FIGS]; Maxwell, 1992). Testing Session Procedures Prior to testing, participants abstained for >3 hr from caffeine and/or smoking/nicotine, also as from alcohol/drugs (besides contraceptives and medication needed for any stabilized physical condition) starting at midnight. Upon arrival to the laboratory, subjective mood evaluations have been carried out. Concurrently, electrodes have been applied, just after which the experiment commenced. This study was approved by the Royal Ottawa Overall health Care Group and also the University of Ottawa Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Boards and informed consent was obtained from all participants. Participants wereJ Affect Disord. Author manuscript; obtainable in PMC 2013 February 1.Jaworska et al.Pagecompensated 30.00 CDN/session (patients participated in several sessions as a part of a larger study).NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptSubjective Mood Questionnaires Mood was assessed using the Profile of Mood States (POMS; McNair et al., 1992) on which participants rated their subjective state utilizing a Danirixin site Likert scale on 65 mood adjectives, from which values had been aggregated to kind seven mood dimensions (tension-anxiety, depressiondejection, anger-hostility, vigor-activity, fatigue-inertia, confusion-bewilderment and total mood disturbance). Emotional Faces Recognition Process The faces recognition job was adapted from Krolak-Salmon et al. (2001). Thirty-six photographic faces displaying certainly one of four expressions (sadness [sad], joy, surprise [sur], neutral) were presented individually on a screen in front on the seated participant ( 1 m) within a dim, electrically-shielded and sound-attenuated space. Each emotion was expressed at three intensities (20 , 50 , 100 ) by one particular actor. Two males and two females displayed one emotion at all intensities (i.e., 16 actors). Expressions at 20 intensity have been thought of “neutral” as they are not reliably distinguished (Orgeta Phillips, 2008) and 0 expressions are a lot more probably to become confused with negative than with other facial expressions (Palermo Coltheart, 2004). Photographs were digitized and converted to grey-scale images, matched for luminance and contrast, together with the neck and hair cropped out (Figure 1). Every expression (neutral, sad50, sad100, joy50, joy100, sur50, sur100) was pseudorandomly presented 80 instances (no identical faces presented back-to-back) for 400 ms (ISI: 1500 ms; Presentation Computer software, Neurobehavioral Systems, Albany, CA, USA). Participants pressed a button to surprised faces (sur50, sur100) to ensure that they paid consideration to expressions. Hits ( correct responses to sur50 sur100), false alarms (FA; responses to non-surprised faces) and reaction times (RT) have been recorded. Facial Expression Rating Questionnaire Following the job, participants rated 10 faces (one male and one particular female expressing every single of joy50, joy100, sad50, sad100 and neutral) presented throughout the activity. Faces have been rated utilizing a Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to ten (extremely substantially) on two valence questions: how 1) “sad” and 2) “happy” does the face look. Participants rated the faces based on their gut reaction, taking two? min to rate all faces. Two questionnaire versions, containing various faces but bearing precisely the same expressions, had been administered. No variations existed amongst the versions, hence, ratings have been averaged across the questionnaires. Electrophysiological Recordings PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21228935/ Data Reduction EEG activity was recorded (500 Hz) using a cap embedded.