Sts were chosen because their corresponding receptors (TLR3, TLR4, and TLR

Sts were chosen because their corresponding receptors (TLR3, TLR4, and TLR7, respectively) are differentially expressed by antigen presenting cell subsets in the peripheral blood and because intracellular signaling through these T helper 1polarizing TLRs spans the signaling pathways downstream of all TLRs [17,34]. The concentration of each agonist was chosen from a dose response curve performed in the Nil tube (Figure S1). Compared to the standard assay, modulation of QFT-GIT with poly(I:C) (10 and 100 mg/ml), LPS (125 and 500 pg/ml), and imiquimod (1 and 5 mg/ml) resulted in a dose-dependent ML 281 enhancement of IFN-c response in blood from subjects with LTBI but not from the uninfected controls (Figure 1 and Table 1). Higher concentrations of LPS (10 ng/ml) elicited a purchase MC-LR non-specific response in T cells from uninfected controls (data not shown). Testing of 10 additional subjects with LTBI and 10 additional uninfected controls with an intermediate concentration of poly(I:C) (40 mg/ml), LPS (250 pg/ml), and imiquimod (2 mg/ ml) showed a significant enhancement of IFN-c response in T cells from subjects with LTBI but not from the uninfected controls (Figure S2). Although LPS at a concentration of 250 pg/ml significantly increased the IFN-c response from uninfected controls, the magnitude of the responses remained low and did not exceed 0.5 IU/ml (Figure S2). Overall, the effect of immunomodulation on IGRA with each ligand was heterogeneous across infected subjects with T cells from each individual responding variably to different concentrations of the same stimulus. The enhancement of IFN-c response ranged from 1.6 to 12.1 fold (median, 5.7) with poly(I:C), 1 to 9.5 fold (median, 3.1) with LPS, and 1.4 to 9.1 fold (median, 3) with imiquimod (Figure S2). There was also variability in the magnitude of IFN-c response enhancement when immunomodulation was repeated in the same individual on two different occasions (data not shown). We also investigated for synergy between PAMPs based on studies in mice showing synergistic action between TLRs and other PAMP sensors such as Nod-like receptor family member, Nod1, in generation of adaptive immune responses [35]. Immunomodulation of QFT-GIT with a combination of poly(I:C) (10 1081537 mg/ml) and Nod1 agonist Tri-DAP (10 mg/ml) was highly synergistic compared to each ligand alone in T cells from six individuals withFigure 1. Immunomodulation of Quantiferon assay BI-78D3 chemical information enhances the IFN-c response in subjects with LTBI. Representative IFN-c response (TB Ag minus Nil) for uninfected controls (Panel A) and individuals with LTBI (Panel B) tested with the QFT-GIT assay in the absence or presence of two concentrations of poly(I:C), LPS, and imiquimod (IMQ). Representative individuals from each group showed similar results as the rest of the group in terms of the trend and the intensity of response. Data are representative of eight individuals in each group. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048027.gLTBI while a low response was elicited in T cells from 2 of 6 individuals in the control group (Figure 2).Modulation of IGRA elicits IFN-c 16574785 responses in IGRAunresponsive subjectsThe findings above suggest that immunomodulation of IGRA may be a useful strategy for revealing T cell responses in subjects with LTBI who otherwise do not MedChemExpress HIV-RT inhibitor 1 respond to in vitro stimulation with antigens alone. To test this hypothesis, we performed the QFT-GIT assay without and with immunomodulation in seven individuals with documented histories of LTBI (positive TST and.Sts were chosen because their corresponding receptors (TLR3, TLR4, and TLR7, respectively) are differentially expressed by antigen presenting cell subsets in the peripheral blood and because intracellular signaling through these T helper 1polarizing TLRs spans the signaling pathways downstream of all TLRs [17,34]. The concentration of each agonist was chosen from a dose response curve performed in the Nil tube (Figure S1). Compared to the standard assay, modulation of QFT-GIT with poly(I:C) (10 and 100 mg/ml), LPS (125 and 500 pg/ml), and imiquimod (1 and 5 mg/ml) resulted in a dose-dependent enhancement of IFN-c response in blood from subjects with LTBI but not from the uninfected controls (Figure 1 and Table 1). Higher concentrations of LPS (10 ng/ml) elicited a non-specific response in T cells from uninfected controls (data not shown). Testing of 10 additional subjects with LTBI and 10 additional uninfected controls with an intermediate concentration of poly(I:C) (40 mg/ml), LPS (250 pg/ml), and imiquimod (2 mg/ ml) showed a significant enhancement of IFN-c response in T cells from subjects with LTBI but not from the uninfected controls (Figure S2). Although LPS at a concentration of 250 pg/ml significantly increased the IFN-c response from uninfected controls, the magnitude of the responses remained low and did not exceed 0.5 IU/ml (Figure S2). Overall, the effect of immunomodulation on IGRA with each ligand was heterogeneous across infected subjects with T cells from each individual responding variably to different concentrations of the same stimulus. The enhancement of IFN-c response ranged from 1.6 to 12.1 fold (median, 5.7) with poly(I:C), 1 to 9.5 fold (median, 3.1) with LPS, and 1.4 to 9.1 fold (median, 3) with imiquimod (Figure S2). There was also variability in the magnitude of IFN-c response enhancement when immunomodulation was repeated in the same individual on two different occasions (data not shown). We also investigated for synergy between PAMPs based on studies in mice showing synergistic action between TLRs and other PAMP sensors such as Nod-like receptor family member, Nod1, in generation of adaptive immune responses [35]. Immunomodulation of QFT-GIT with a combination of poly(I:C) (10 1081537 mg/ml) and Nod1 agonist Tri-DAP (10 mg/ml) was highly synergistic compared to each ligand alone in T cells from six individuals withFigure 1. Immunomodulation of Quantiferon assay enhances the IFN-c response in subjects with LTBI. Representative IFN-c response (TB Ag minus Nil) for uninfected controls (Panel A) and individuals with LTBI (Panel B) tested with the QFT-GIT assay in the absence or presence of two concentrations of poly(I:C), LPS, and imiquimod (IMQ). Representative individuals from each group showed similar results as the rest of the group in terms of the trend and the intensity of response. Data are representative of eight individuals in each group. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048027.gLTBI while a low response was elicited in T cells from 2 of 6 individuals in the control group (Figure 2).Modulation of IGRA elicits IFN-c 16574785 responses in IGRAunresponsive subjectsThe findings above suggest that immunomodulation of IGRA may be a useful strategy for revealing T cell responses in subjects with LTBI who otherwise do not respond to in vitro stimulation with antigens alone. To test this hypothesis, we performed the QFT-GIT assay without and with immunomodulation in seven individuals with documented histories of LTBI (positive TST and.Sts were chosen because their corresponding receptors (TLR3, TLR4, and TLR7, respectively) are differentially expressed by antigen presenting cell subsets in the peripheral blood and because intracellular signaling through these T helper 1polarizing TLRs spans the signaling pathways downstream of all TLRs [17,34]. The concentration of each agonist was chosen from a dose response curve performed in the Nil tube (Figure S1). Compared to the standard assay, modulation of QFT-GIT with poly(I:C) (10 and 100 mg/ml), LPS (125 and 500 pg/ml), and imiquimod (1 and 5 mg/ml) resulted in a dose-dependent enhancement of IFN-c response in blood from subjects with LTBI but not from the uninfected controls (Figure 1 and Table 1). Higher concentrations of LPS (10 ng/ml) elicited a non-specific response in T cells from uninfected controls (data not shown). Testing of 10 additional subjects with LTBI and 10 additional uninfected controls with an intermediate concentration of poly(I:C) (40 mg/ml), LPS (250 pg/ml), and imiquimod (2 mg/ ml) showed a significant enhancement of IFN-c response in T cells from subjects with LTBI but not from the uninfected controls (Figure S2). Although LPS at a concentration of 250 pg/ml significantly increased the IFN-c response from uninfected controls, the magnitude of the responses remained low and did not exceed 0.5 IU/ml (Figure S2). Overall, the effect of immunomodulation on IGRA with each ligand was heterogeneous across infected subjects with T cells from each individual responding variably to different concentrations of the same stimulus. The enhancement of IFN-c response ranged from 1.6 to 12.1 fold (median, 5.7) with poly(I:C), 1 to 9.5 fold (median, 3.1) with LPS, and 1.4 to 9.1 fold (median, 3) with imiquimod (Figure S2). There was also variability in the magnitude of IFN-c response enhancement when immunomodulation was repeated in the same individual on two different occasions (data not shown). We also investigated for synergy between PAMPs based on studies in mice showing synergistic action between TLRs and other PAMP sensors such as Nod-like receptor family member, Nod1, in generation of adaptive immune responses [35]. Immunomodulation of QFT-GIT with a combination of poly(I:C) (10 1081537 mg/ml) and Nod1 agonist Tri-DAP (10 mg/ml) was highly synergistic compared to each ligand alone in T cells from six individuals withFigure 1. Immunomodulation of Quantiferon assay enhances the IFN-c response in subjects with LTBI. Representative IFN-c response (TB Ag minus Nil) for uninfected controls (Panel A) and individuals with LTBI (Panel B) tested with the QFT-GIT assay in the absence or presence of two concentrations of poly(I:C), LPS, and imiquimod (IMQ). Representative individuals from each group showed similar results as the rest of the group in terms of the trend and the intensity of response. Data are representative of eight individuals in each group. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048027.gLTBI while a low response was elicited in T cells from 2 of 6 individuals in the control group (Figure 2).Modulation of IGRA elicits IFN-c 16574785 responses in IGRAunresponsive subjectsThe findings above suggest that immunomodulation of IGRA may be a useful strategy for revealing T cell responses in subjects with LTBI who otherwise do not respond to in vitro stimulation with antigens alone. To test this hypothesis, we performed the QFT-GIT assay without and with immunomodulation in seven individuals with documented histories of LTBI (positive TST and.Sts were chosen because their corresponding receptors (TLR3, TLR4, and TLR7, respectively) are differentially expressed by antigen presenting cell subsets in the peripheral blood and because intracellular signaling through these T helper 1polarizing TLRs spans the signaling pathways downstream of all TLRs [17,34]. The concentration of each agonist was chosen from a dose response curve performed in the Nil tube (Figure S1). Compared to the standard assay, modulation of QFT-GIT with poly(I:C) (10 and 100 mg/ml), LPS (125 and 500 pg/ml), and imiquimod (1 and 5 mg/ml) resulted in a dose-dependent enhancement of IFN-c response in blood from subjects with LTBI but not from the uninfected controls (Figure 1 and Table 1). Higher concentrations of LPS (10 ng/ml) elicited a non-specific response in T cells from uninfected controls (data not shown). Testing of 10 additional subjects with LTBI and 10 additional uninfected controls with an intermediate concentration of poly(I:C) (40 mg/ml), LPS (250 pg/ml), and imiquimod (2 mg/ ml) showed a significant enhancement of IFN-c response in T cells from subjects with LTBI but not from the uninfected controls (Figure S2). Although LPS at a concentration of 250 pg/ml significantly increased the IFN-c response from uninfected controls, the magnitude of the responses remained low and did not exceed 0.5 IU/ml (Figure S2). Overall, the effect of immunomodulation on IGRA with each ligand was heterogeneous across infected subjects with T cells from each individual responding variably to different concentrations of the same stimulus. The enhancement of IFN-c response ranged from 1.6 to 12.1 fold (median, 5.7) with poly(I:C), 1 to 9.5 fold (median, 3.1) with LPS, and 1.4 to 9.1 fold (median, 3) with imiquimod (Figure S2). There was also variability in the magnitude of IFN-c response enhancement when immunomodulation was repeated in the same individual on two different occasions (data not shown). We also investigated for synergy between PAMPs based on studies in mice showing synergistic action between TLRs and other PAMP sensors such as Nod-like receptor family member, Nod1, in generation of adaptive immune responses [35]. Immunomodulation of QFT-GIT with a combination of poly(I:C) (10 1081537 mg/ml) and Nod1 agonist Tri-DAP (10 mg/ml) was highly synergistic compared to each ligand alone in T cells from six individuals withFigure 1. Immunomodulation of Quantiferon assay enhances the IFN-c response in subjects with LTBI. Representative IFN-c response (TB Ag minus Nil) for uninfected controls (Panel A) and individuals with LTBI (Panel B) tested with the QFT-GIT assay in the absence or presence of two concentrations of poly(I:C), LPS, and imiquimod (IMQ). Representative individuals from each group showed similar results as the rest of the group in terms of the trend and the intensity of response. Data are representative of eight individuals in each group. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048027.gLTBI while a low response was elicited in T cells from 2 of 6 individuals in the control group (Figure 2).Modulation of IGRA elicits IFN-c 16574785 responses in IGRAunresponsive subjectsThe findings above suggest that immunomodulation of IGRA may be a useful strategy for revealing T cell responses in subjects with LTBI who otherwise do not respond to in vitro stimulation with antigens alone. To test this hypothesis, we performed the QFT-GIT assay without and with immunomodulation in seven individuals with documented histories of LTBI (positive TST and.