L fluency, with the total number of words, minus intrusions and

L fluency, with the total number of words, minus intrusions and perseverations, analyzed for each test. Trail Making Tests. Trail Making Tests A and B are tests of attention (Trails A) and executive functioning (Trails B), specifically cognitive control and visuo-motor scanning (76). Participants corrected incident errors by returning to their last correct response and continuing from there. The stopwatch recorded the time while corrections were made. Scores reflected time to completion (in seconds) separately for Trails A and B. Higher scores indicate poorer performance. Digits Span Forward and Backward. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, digits span-forward (DS-F) and digits span-backward (DS-B) (77), assesses attention and working memory, respectively. DS-F involves orally presenting a series of single-digit numbers at increasing digit span lengths for participants to repeat in the same order. The numbers?span length ranges from 3 to 9 digits. Two trials at each span are presented. The test is discontinued when participants incorrectly repeat both trials at a specified span. DS-B is similar to DS-F, except that participants repeat a series of increasingly longer spans of single digit numbers in reverse order. The numbers?span length ranges from 2 to 8 digits. The total score for both DS-F and DS-B is 14. In sum, most cognitive test scores?direction was “better performance with a higher score”; the reverse was true for the BVRT and Trails A and B. Covariates Potentially confounding covariates were Agebase, Yearbase, sex, race/ ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and other ethnicity), education (y), smokingbase (“never,” “former”, or “current smoker”), and measured baseline BMI [BMIbase, weight/(height)2 in kg/m2]. First-visit measures (i.e., visit 1 of the BLSA) were also considered for the descriptive part of the analysis. Statistical methods Analyses were performed using Stata version 11.0 (78). Participant characteristics (fixed and at first-visit) were described and compared by data availability and by sex using a 1-factor ANOVA, t test, and x2 test. APTO-253 manufacturer Mixed-effects linear regression models were used to examine associations of baseline caffeine and alcohol intakes and NAS with baseline cognitive performance (cross-sectional effect) and their relations with cognitive change over time (longitudinal effect), controlling for Agebase, sex, and other “baseline” or fixed covariates, including race/ ethnicity, education, baseline smoking status, and baseline BMI. These models, which we term time-interval, mixed-effects regression models, were RG7800 site adapted from a previously published study that described the methodology in detail (79). Time elapsed (y) was measured from Agebase (per cognitive test). 892 Beydoun et al.Equations 1.1?.4 Multilevel models vs. composite models Yij ?p0i ?p1i Timeij ?eij p0i ?g00 ?+a? g0a Xaij ?+k? g 0k Zik ?z0i Eq: 1:1 ?1:4 p1i ?g 10 ?+a? g 1a Xaij ?+m? g 1m Zim ?z1i Yij ?g 00 ?+a? g 0a Xaij ?+k? g 0k Zik �g 10 Timeij ?+a? g 1a Xa ijTimeij ?+m? g 1m Zim Timeij ��z0i ?z1i Timeij ?eij ?where Yij represents cognitive test scores for individual “i” and visit “j”; p0i , level-1 intercept for individual i; p1i , level-1 slope for individual i; g 00 , level-2 intercept of the random intercept p0i ; g 10 , level-2 intercept of the slope p1i ; and Zik , a vector of individual-level fixed baseline covariates (including Agebase) predicting level-1 intercepts (p0i ) and level-1 slopes (p1i ).L fluency, with the total number of words, minus intrusions and perseverations, analyzed for each test. Trail Making Tests. Trail Making Tests A and B are tests of attention (Trails A) and executive functioning (Trails B), specifically cognitive control and visuo-motor scanning (76). Participants corrected incident errors by returning to their last correct response and continuing from there. The stopwatch recorded the time while corrections were made. Scores reflected time to completion (in seconds) separately for Trails A and B. Higher scores indicate poorer performance. Digits Span Forward and Backward. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, digits span-forward (DS-F) and digits span-backward (DS-B) (77), assesses attention and working memory, respectively. DS-F involves orally presenting a series of single-digit numbers at increasing digit span lengths for participants to repeat in the same order. The numbers?span length ranges from 3 to 9 digits. Two trials at each span are presented. The test is discontinued when participants incorrectly repeat both trials at a specified span. DS-B is similar to DS-F, except that participants repeat a series of increasingly longer spans of single digit numbers in reverse order. The numbers?span length ranges from 2 to 8 digits. The total score for both DS-F and DS-B is 14. In sum, most cognitive test scores?direction was “better performance with a higher score”; the reverse was true for the BVRT and Trails A and B. Covariates Potentially confounding covariates were Agebase, Yearbase, sex, race/ ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and other ethnicity), education (y), smokingbase (“never,” “former”, or “current smoker”), and measured baseline BMI [BMIbase, weight/(height)2 in kg/m2]. First-visit measures (i.e., visit 1 of the BLSA) were also considered for the descriptive part of the analysis. Statistical methods Analyses were performed using Stata version 11.0 (78). Participant characteristics (fixed and at first-visit) were described and compared by data availability and by sex using a 1-factor ANOVA, t test, and x2 test. Mixed-effects linear regression models were used to examine associations of baseline caffeine and alcohol intakes and NAS with baseline cognitive performance (cross-sectional effect) and their relations with cognitive change over time (longitudinal effect), controlling for Agebase, sex, and other “baseline” or fixed covariates, including race/ ethnicity, education, baseline smoking status, and baseline BMI. These models, which we term time-interval, mixed-effects regression models, were adapted from a previously published study that described the methodology in detail (79). Time elapsed (y) was measured from Agebase (per cognitive test). 892 Beydoun et al.Equations 1.1?.4 Multilevel models vs. composite models Yij ?p0i ?p1i Timeij ?eij p0i ?g00 ?+a? g0a Xaij ?+k? g 0k Zik ?z0i Eq: 1:1 ?1:4 p1i ?g 10 ?+a? g 1a Xaij ?+m? g 1m Zim ?z1i Yij ?g 00 ?+a? g 0a Xaij ?+k? g 0k Zik �g 10 Timeij ?+a? g 1a Xa ijTimeij ?+m? g 1m Zim Timeij ��z0i ?z1i Timeij ?eij ?where Yij represents cognitive test scores for individual “i” and visit “j”; p0i , level-1 intercept for individual i; p1i , level-1 slope for individual i; g 00 , level-2 intercept of the random intercept p0i ; g 10 , level-2 intercept of the slope p1i ; and Zik , a vector of individual-level fixed baseline covariates (including Agebase) predicting level-1 intercepts (p0i ) and level-1 slopes (p1i ).