Y (Maastricht, The Netherlands). The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Y (Maastricht, The Netherlands). The authors declare no competing financial interest. Correspondence AMG9810 price should be addressed to either Marieke Mur or Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]. D.A. Ruff’s present address: Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. J. Bodurka’s present address: Laureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 South Yale Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74136-3326. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2334-11.2012 Copyright ?2012 the authors 0270-6474/12/328649-14 15.00/occasional use of item-specific designs in human studies in other domains (Bedny et al., 2007), single-image responses in human visual cortex have not been Varlitinib biological activity thoroughly investigated in objectvision functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We measured single-image fMRI activity elicited by 96 stimuli from a wide range of object categories without assuming any predefined grouping in design or analysis. In Kriegeskorte et al. (2008), we analyzed these data for multivoxel pattern effects. We found that single-image activity patterns in hIT (including the lateral occipital complex [Malach et al., 1995], FFA and PPA) reflect natural categories: when activity patterns are grouped by their similarity, patterns elicited by images of the same category fall into the same cluster. Here, we focus on category-selective regions (rather than hIT as a whole) and on regional-average activation (rather than pattern information), thus relating the single-image approach to the earlier literature on category selectivity in human visual cortex. This enables us to investigate (1) whether each image from the preferred category elicits greater activation than any image outside the preferred category (categorical ranking), (2) whether there are activation differences within and outside the preferred category (gradedness), and (3) whether the activation profile (with stimuli ordered by the activation they elicit) falls off continuously across the category boundary or exhibits a discontinuity at the boundary (category step). We introduce a number of specialized analyses for addressing these three questions. Our analyses rely on dividing the 96image data into two independent sets, estimating the activation profile from one dataset and then using the other dataset to test for (1) replicable inversions of rank, i.e., a member of a nonpre-8650 ?J. Neurosci., June 20, 2012 ?32(25):8649 ?Mur et al. ?Single-Image Activation of Category Regionsferred category eliciting greater activation than a member of the preferred category (indicating a violation of categorical ranking); (2) replicable rankings (indicating graded responses); and (3) the necessity of a category step in modeling the falloff of activation from strongly to weakly activating stimuli.Materials and MethodsExperimentsThe fMRI experiment has been described in detail in Kriegeskorte et al. (2008). We therefore only describe the essential features here.SubjectsFour healthy human volunteers participated in the fMRI experiment (mean age 35 years; two females). Subjects were right-handed and had normal or corrected-to-normal vision. Before scanning, the subjects received information about the procedure of the experiment and gave their written informed consent for participating. The experiment was conducted in accordance with the Institutional Review Board of the National Institutes.Y (Maastricht, The Netherlands). The authors declare no competing financial interest. Correspondence should be addressed to either Marieke Mur or Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]. D.A. Ruff’s present address: Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. J. Bodurka’s present address: Laureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 South Yale Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74136-3326. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2334-11.2012 Copyright ?2012 the authors 0270-6474/12/328649-14 15.00/occasional use of item-specific designs in human studies in other domains (Bedny et al., 2007), single-image responses in human visual cortex have not been thoroughly investigated in objectvision functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We measured single-image fMRI activity elicited by 96 stimuli from a wide range of object categories without assuming any predefined grouping in design or analysis. In Kriegeskorte et al. (2008), we analyzed these data for multivoxel pattern effects. We found that single-image activity patterns in hIT (including the lateral occipital complex [Malach et al., 1995], FFA and PPA) reflect natural categories: when activity patterns are grouped by their similarity, patterns elicited by images of the same category fall into the same cluster. Here, we focus on category-selective regions (rather than hIT as a whole) and on regional-average activation (rather than pattern information), thus relating the single-image approach to the earlier literature on category selectivity in human visual cortex. This enables us to investigate (1) whether each image from the preferred category elicits greater activation than any image outside the preferred category (categorical ranking), (2) whether there are activation differences within and outside the preferred category (gradedness), and (3) whether the activation profile (with stimuli ordered by the activation they elicit) falls off continuously across the category boundary or exhibits a discontinuity at the boundary (category step). We introduce a number of specialized analyses for addressing these three questions. Our analyses rely on dividing the 96image data into two independent sets, estimating the activation profile from one dataset and then using the other dataset to test for (1) replicable inversions of rank, i.e., a member of a nonpre-8650 ?J. Neurosci., June 20, 2012 ?32(25):8649 ?Mur et al. ?Single-Image Activation of Category Regionsferred category eliciting greater activation than a member of the preferred category (indicating a violation of categorical ranking); (2) replicable rankings (indicating graded responses); and (3) the necessity of a category step in modeling the falloff of activation from strongly to weakly activating stimuli.Materials and MethodsExperimentsThe fMRI experiment has been described in detail in Kriegeskorte et al. (2008). We therefore only describe the essential features here.SubjectsFour healthy human volunteers participated in the fMRI experiment (mean age 35 years; two females). Subjects were right-handed and had normal or corrected-to-normal vision. Before scanning, the subjects received information about the procedure of the experiment and gave their written informed consent for participating. The experiment was conducted in accordance with the Institutional Review Board of the National Institutes.