E variance in BID-change above that of thin-ideal internalisation and self-esteemTable two Descriptive Statistics for

E variance in BID-change above that of thin-ideal internalisation and self-esteemTable two Descriptive Statistics for Pre-BID, Post-BID and BID-Change Scores in Each Exposure GroupsPre-BID M Media (n = 91) Facebook (n = 102) two.939 two.960 SD .664 .600 Post-BID M three.062 three.180 SD .705 .677 BID-change score (Post-Pre) M .123 .220 SD .289 .For those exposed to Facebook, the complete model predicting BID-change from thin-ideal internalisation, self-esteem and AC was substantial and accounted for 17.three in the variance in BID-change, R2 = .173, F (three,98) = 6.841, p .01; adjusted R2 = .148. Adding AC drastically accounted for eight.1 additional variance in BID-change above that of thin-ideal internalisation and self-esteem F (1,98) = 9.566, p .003. Controlling for thin-ideal internalisation and self-esteem, AC was a important predictor of BID-change, indicating that for everybody one point improve in AC, BID scores had been anticipated to raise by .074 points following exposure to Facebook stimuli (B = .074, t = 3.093, p = .003). Table 4 lists the hierarchical several regression benefits for every single sort of exposure. To test the prediction that the extent of Facebook use would predict baseline BID, a many regression analysis was run, controlling for baseline self-esteem, BMI and pre-thin-ideal internalisation (based on order GSK2269557 (free base) theoretical rationale [50] and the considerable correlations among these variables and baseline BID). The general model was considerable, accounting for 40.three in the variance in baseline BID R2 = .403, F (4,177) = 29.880, p .01; adjusted R2 = .390. Controlling for the other predictors within the model, extent of Facebook use was a important predictor of baseline BID, such that for each and every 1 hour enhance in Facebook use, BID is anticipated to boost by .007 points (B = .007, t = -2.327, p = .021). Table 5 lists the various regression outcomes. To determine the degree of perceived similarity between experimental stimuli and Facebookmedia photos, responses towards the query, “the forms of pictures I saw inside the stimuli have been equivalent to what I see everyday” had been analysed. On average participants exposed to media stimuli discovered the stimuli drastically more comparable to what they reported seeing everyday (M = 3.32, SD = 1.191) when compared with those exposed towards the Facebook stimuli (M = 1.81, SD = 1.069), t (1,191) = 9.249, p .001. The extent of Facebook use and ED threat was assessed. Participants scoring greater than or equal to 20 around the EAT-26 had been viewed as at higher risk, and these less than 20, at low risk for an ED [49]. The average extent of Facebook use was 21.54 h per week (SD = 16.715) for those inside the high-risk group PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299874 and 14.91 h per week (SD = 11.606) for all those in the low- risk group. Extent of Facebook use was not usually distributed across threat groups. A Mann hitney U test was as a result run to identify differences in extent of Facebook use involving those at high- (EAT-26 score =20, n = 26) in comparison to low-risk (EAT-26 score 20, n = 157) for an ED.Cohen and Blaszczynski Journal of Consuming Problems (2015) three:Web page 7 ofTable three Summary of your Hierarchical Regression Evaluation Predicting BID-Change (n = 193)Model 1 Variable Intercept Pre-thin-ideal internalisation Pre-self-esteem B -.081 .015 -.030 SEB .162 .004 .040 .296 -.055 .one hundred two Intercept Pre-thin-ideal internalisation Pre-self-esteem AC Exposure -.136 .007 -.005 .066 .054 .178 .004 .041 .020 .041 .136 -.010 .267 .096 .155 three Intercept Pre-thin-ideal internalisation Pre-self-esteem AC Exposure ACexpo.