Ection criteria applied for the Facebook images was applied towards the series of 20 Media

Ection criteria applied for the Facebook images was applied towards the series of 20 Media photos; thin-ideal M = four.3, SD = 1.16.Manipulation checkThe 7-item Pressure subscale, on the list of four Hematoporphyrin (dihydrochloride) subscales on the Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire ersion three (SATAQ-V3) [41], was utilised to assess perceived stress from media to attain the thinideal on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to five (strongly agree). Things have been summed to receive a score of thin-ideal internalisation at pre-exposure, with a high score indicating higher internalisation of your media’s thin-ideal. Preceding work identified that the Pressure subscale (alpha = .84) drastically predicted high BID inside a sample of 401 female undergraduates [42]. The scale showed fantastic reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = .83).Self-esteemA manipulation check was included to ensure that participants paid sufficient focus towards the experimental stimuli. Participants had been asked to pick two photos that they viewed around the stimuli pictures out of 4 achievable selections; two stimuli photographs, and two closely matchedRosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale [43] was utilised to measure baseline self-esteem. This 10-item scale needs participants to indicate their agreement with every statement on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to four (strongly agree). Resulting scores variety from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher self-esteem. A study reported fantastic reliability PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21301260 (alpha = .88) amongst a sample of Australian students [6]. The scale showed superior reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = .88).Cohen and Blaszczynski Journal of Consuming Problems (2015) three:Page four ofBody image dissatisfactionThe Physique Locations Satisfaction Scale (BASS), one of many 5 subscales of the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire-Appearance Scales (MBSRQ) [44], was employed to assess existing perceptions of one’s body image, asking participants to reflect on their amount of satisfaction with nine aspects of their physical look, “as you really feel suitable now”. For the objective on the existing investigation question taking a look at changes in state BID following brief exposure, this subscale was utilized to measure state BID at pre and post-exposure. Products have been scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (incredibly satisfied) to 5 (really dissatisfied), with higher scores indicating high state BID. The subscales showed acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = .789). The literature shows that baseline BID moderates the relationship in between media exposure and subsequent BID [7, 457]. Hence it was necessary to account for pre-exposure BID. Pre-exposure BID scores had been subtracted from post-exposure BID scores to make a BID- modify score. Negative BID-change scores indicate a lower in BID from pre to post- exposure, whereas constructive BID-change scores indicate a rise in BID from pre to post- exposure.Look comparison1 (generally) to six (never ever). This scale was reported to have great reliability (alpha = .90) amongst anorexia nervosa sufferers [48] and has been made use of to recognize consuming disturbances in non-clinical samples [49]. Item scores were summed for an all round test score, ranging from 0 to 78. Making use of recommendations for non-clinical samples [49], those who acquire a score of 20+ are regarded as high threat of having an ED. For this study, the scale showed great reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = .870).ProcedureThe Human Investigation Ethics Committee of your University of Sydney authorized the study. Participants had been emailed the p.