Art. wear on the surface and in the calotte region, right--TheArt. put on on the

Art. wear on the surface and in the calotte region, right–The
Art. put on on the surface and within the calotte area, right–The fastening element.Components NCF3015 WC 0.08 0.Each of the forging tools within the analyzed procedure are made of W360 steels (Table 1). All of the forging tools within the analyzed approach are produced of W360 steels (Table 1). After thermal and thermo-mechanical treatment as well as finishing mechanical treatTable 1. The ment, they obtain hardness of about 600(NCF3015) and tools (W360) punches (Figure 2c) and chemical composition from the input material HV (about 53.five HRC) for [ ]. more than 1100 HV for dies (after nitriding of their surface within the depth ofNb about 0.two mm).V The Si Mn P Ti Ni Mo Al Cr Cu0.50 0.20 0.50 0.25 0.015 two.30.90 303.50 0.4.00 3.00 1.6.20 13.55.5 four.50 0.40.90 max 0.five 0.Immediately after thermal and thermo-mechanical therapy as well as finishing mechanicalMaterials 2021, 14, x FOR PEER Review Supplies 2021, 14,4 of 21 4 of2c) and over 1100 HV for dies (right after nitriding of their surface in the depth of about 0.2 mm). The prepared tools arethe functioning temperature of about 20050 C prior to the commence of prepared tools are heated to heated to the operating temperature of about 20050 before the start out of the forging method. extrusion process, the procedure, thedies in(only dies in the the forging method. During the For the duration of the extrusion tools (only tools the first and very first along with the secondwithout punches) arepunches) are lubricated andacooled having a lubrisecond operations, operations, devoid of lubricated and cooled with lubricating-cooling agent based on graphite. A detailed analysis was performed on the forging punch (produced of cating-cooling agent depending on graphite. A detailed analysis was performed of the forging W360 (produced of W360 steel, Figure 2c) applied in the second operation–finishing comparatively punchsteel, Figure 2c) applied inside the second operation–finishing forging–due to itsforging– low durability, specially within the vicinity from the calotte (Figure the calotte (Figure 3), as a because of its fairly low durability, especially in the vicinity of 3), because of increased adhesion of the charge material to charge substrate. result of elevated adhesion from the the toolmaterial to the tool substrate.Figure three. View from the schematic with the punch. Figure three. View in the schematic from the punch.In an effort to carry out complex analysis, the following analysis strategies had been applied: In order to perform aa complicated evaluation, the following research approaches have been apMacroscopic research combined with a measurement in the degree of wear/excess on plied: the tool’s operating surface via scanning by indicates of a measuring arm ROMER Macroscopic studies combined having a measurement in the degree of wear/excess on Absolute ARM 7520SI (Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence, Cobham, UK) integrated the tool’s functioning surface by means of scanning by suggests of a measuring arm ROMER using a RS3 scanner (Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence, Cobham, UK), at the same time Absolute ARM 7520SI (Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence, Cobham, UK) inteas a comparison of the scan geometry using the CAD models (Version number 1.five, grated using a RS3 scanner (Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence, Cobham, UK), as CGP35348 Cancer Krotoszyn, Poland), and also reconstruction on the wear history with the key region, the properly as a comparison of the scan geometry using the CAD models (Version number “calotte”, depending on reverse scanning; all punches had been cleaned just before evaluation. 1.five, Krotoszyn, Poland), and also reconstruction from the wear history of your important area, A “calotte”, depending on reverse scanning; w.