He experimental results, their interpretation, experimental concludescription with the experimental benefitsHe experimental results, their interpretation,

He experimental results, their interpretation, experimental concludescription with the experimental benefits
He experimental results, their interpretation, experimental concludescription with the experimental results, their interpretation, and theand the experimental conclusions that drawn. sions that may be can be drawn.3.1. Microstructure and Identification of Intermetallic Phases three.1. Microstructure and Identification of Intermetallic Phases Figure 1 presents the SEM micrograph and associated EDS element map for Material C0. Figure 1 presents the SEM micrograph and connected EDS element map for Material C0. The EDS information have been utilised to identify the secondary phases formed inside the matrix alloy. EDS information were made use of to identify the secondary phases formed within the matrix alloy. TheFigure 1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image plus energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) LY294002 Stem Cell/Wnt mapping: Material Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image plus energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping: MateC0. C0. rialMaterials 2021, 14, 6287 Components 2021, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW4 of 11 four ofFigure two shows the SEM micrograph and related EDS element map for Material C1. Figure two shows the SEM micrograph and associated EDS element map for Material C1. In addition to to the Al matrix, the eutectic Si and theSiC particles, several secondary phases Also the Al matrix, the eutectic Si and also the SiC particles, different secondary phases were GNF6702 Epigenetic Reader Domain present with unique morphologies. have been present with unique morphologies.Figure two. SEM image and EDS mapping: Material C1. Figure two. SEM image and EDS mapping: Material C1.Table 2 summarises the at. content material array of the elements within the secondary phases secondary identified identified with EDS. The values offered in Table 22were compared together with the atomic composivalues provided in Table have been compared with all the atomic compotion reported in the literature [305]. The Al content material may be higher than anticipated sition reported within the literature [305].The Al content is often greater than anticipated from the nominal composition as a result of the interaction volume with the matrix with all the electric beam, with an acceleration voltage of 20 kV. kV.Table two. Table 2. Chemical composition range [at. ] of intermetallic phases from EDS spectra. from EDS spectra.Assigned Assigned Phase/ Composition Al Si Si Fe Fe Mg Mg MnMn Phase/ Al LaLa Morphology Composition Morphology detected 72.55.3 14.47.9 1.two.1 7.6.two -Al8FeMg3Si6/ detected 72.55.3 14.47.9 1.two.1 7.6.two lath nominal 44.four 33.three five.five 16 Al8 FeMg3 Si6 / nominal 33.3 5.5 16 lath detected44.4 70.01.6 ten.01.eight three.5.54 11.72.0 – -Al15(Fe,Mn)3Si2/ detected 70.01.6 65.2 ten.01.eight 8.6 3.5.54 13 – polygonal nominal – 11.72.0 13 Al15 (Fe,Mn)three Si2 / eight.six 13 13 polygonal detected65.2 82.13.6 3.8.1 – 1.9.1 Al20(Ce,La)Ti2/ nominal polygonal nominal – 4.1 detected 82.13.six 83.three three.8.1 – 1.9.1 Al20 (Ce,La)Ti2 / polygonal detected83.three 58.05.9 15.88.1 – 1.0.eight Al11(Ce,La)3/ nominal – four.1 lath nominal 64.7 – – 17 detected 58.05.9 15.88.1 1.0.8 Al11 (Ce,La)3 / lath nominal 64.7Ce Ce-Ti TiNi NiCu CuMaterial Material CC1.47.five – -1.47.5 – two.five.7 6.8.two -0.69.74 4.1 8.two -2.5.7 6.8.2 0.69.74 0.eight.0 32.two 1.6.six four.1 8.two 17 0.8.0 32.two 1.six.17 -CCCCCCThe lath phase containing Fe and Mg was identified as the -Al8FeMg3Si6 phase, in line with Casari et al. [30] and Ludwig et al. [31]. The excessive Al content, compared to The lath phase containing Fe and Mg was identified because the -Al8 FeMg Si6 phase, in the nominal composition, is linked to the interaction volume with the electron3beam during line with Casari et al. [30] and Ludwig et al. [31]. The excessive.